Rose v. Silver’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 8 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently December 2020
4 federal appellate · 8 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hanson v. Denckla · Kulko v. Superior Court of California in and for City and County of San Francisco · Cree v. Goldstein · M. A. P. v. Ryan · Environmental Research International, Inc. v. Lockwood Greene Engineers, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he [District of Columbia Court of Appeals has] failed to clarify any possible conflict [between Environmental Be-search and Bose.] Inasmuch as the denial of rehearing is evidence that no irreconciable tension exists between the en banc opinion and a subsequent panel opinion, and considering that a panel of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals “is prohibited from issuing an opinion which conflicts materially with a pri- or decision of [the full] court as this may be done only by the court sitting en banc,” if it were necessary to determine what law controls today in the District of Columbia, we would still be hesitant to conclude that the clear holding against governmental contacts as a basis for jurisdiction in Environmental Besearch no longer controls.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(a) A District of Columbia court may exercise personal jurisdiction over a person, who acts directly or by an agent, as to a claim for relief arising from the person's (1) transacting any business in the District of Columbia.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mouzavires v. Baxter“is prohibited from issuing an opinion which conflicts materially with a prior decision of [the full] court as this may be done only by the court sitting en banc,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.