Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 398 F.2d 531 - Thomas v. United States

Thomas v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

398 F.2d 531 · 1967

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
June 2017
most recently cited

44 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably United States v. Roselli (1970), United States v. Hyde (1971)

44 federal appellate · 1 district ·

340196719701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2

Relies on Pinkerton v. United States · Stirone v. United States · Russell v. United States · Nye & Nissen v. United States · Bain Jr

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the effect of the Court's action was to narrow, not widen, the issues the defendant was called on to meet”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.