United States v. Squeri’s Empirical Analysis
398 F.2d 785 · 1968
Citation profile
40 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently May 2003 · most notably Commonwealth v. Chacko (1983), United States v. Prudden (1970)
40 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Escobedo v. Illinois · Cree v. Goldstein · Mathis v. United States · California v. Curry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* * * [W]e reject the view, adopted by a few district courts in other circuits, that IRS agents must give the Miranda warnings, even though there is no custodial interroga tion, if the investigation has reached the accusatory stage. * * * The Fifth Amendment privilege prohibits the government from compelling a person to incriminate himself. It was the compulsive aspect of custodial interrogation, and not the strength or extent of the government’s suspicions at the time the questioning was conducted, which led the court to impose the Miranda, requirements with regard to custodial questioning. We believe that the presence or absence of compelling pressures, rather than the stage to which the government’s investigation has developed, determines whether the Miranda requirements apply to any particular instance of questioning.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“* * * [T]he information that a taxpayer's returns are under audit gives sufficient notice of the possibility of criminal prosecution regardless of whether the agents contemplate civil or criminal action when they speak to him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.