Leeman v. United States

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Aug. 13, 1968.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1968-08-13

2 counsel of record

Relies on 287 F. Supp. 279 - United States v. Leeman · Standard Oil Co. v. The S. S. Rotti

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1968-08-13

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 1991

6 federal appellate ·

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Donald Richard Leeman, pro se.

¶2Theodore L. Richling, U. S. Atty., for District of Nebraska, Omaha, Neb., for appellee; Duane L. Nelson, Asst. U. S. Atty., on the brief.

¶3Before MATTHES and HEANEY, Circuit Judges, and REGISTER, Chief District Judge.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This appeal involves the third effort of the defendant to secure a reduction of sentence before this Court. We affirm the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska denying the defendant’s motion to correct the sentence. In so doing, we adopt the memorandum decision of Judge Robert Van Pelt as the decision of this Court. D.C., 287 F.Supp. 279 (1968).