Rios v. Ziglar’s Empirical Analysis
398 F.3d 1201 · 2005
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently June 2020 · most notably Robertson v. Las Animas County Sheriff's Department (2007), Champagne Metals v. Ken-Mac Metals, Inc. (2006)
8 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Relies on Office of Personnel Management v. Richmond · Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of Iowa · United States Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Hibi · Phillips v. Calhoun · Tele-Communications Inc Tci v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the party to be estopped must know the facts; (2) the party to be estopped must intend that his conduct will be acted upon or must so act that the party asserting the estoppel has the right to believe that it was so intended; (3) the party asserting the estoppel must be ignorant of the true facts; and (4) the party asserting the estoppel must rely on the other party's conduct to his injury.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A claim of estoppel against the [G]overnment requires an additional element: the party asserting estoppel must show that the [G]overnment has engaged in 'affirmative misconduct.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“To make a sufficient argument on appeal, a party must advance a reasoned argument concerning each ground of the appeal, and it must support its argument with legal authority.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.