Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 398 F.3d 271 - Lacava v. Kyler

Lacava v. Kyler’s Empirical Analysis

398 F.3d 271 · 2005

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
January 2022
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 16 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently January 2022 · most notably Roy v. Lampert (2006), Pabon v. Mahanoy (2011)

13 federal appellate · 16 district ·

290200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs · Christopher Artuz Superintendent Green Haven Correctional Facility v. Tony Bruce Bennett · Miller v. New Jersey State Department of Corrections · Burns v. Morton · Commonwealth v. LaCava

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “attorney error, miscalculation, inadequate research, or other mistakes have not been found to rise to the 'extraordinary' circumstances required for equitable tolling[,]” LaCava, 398 F.3d at 276 (quoting Merritt, 326 F.3d at 169 ). 17 . The Tumer/Finley process also mandates an”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[W]e have cautioned that a statute of limitations should be tolled only in the rare situation where equitable tolling is demanded by sound legal principles as well as the interests of justice.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “does not pertain solely to the filing of the federal habeas petition, rather it is an obligation that exists during the period appellant is exhausting state court remedies as well.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.