Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 398 F.3d 955 - Franklin v. McCaughtry

Franklin v. McCaughtry’s Empirical Analysis

398 F.3d 955 · 2005

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
October 2023
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently October 2023

9 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

110200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Williams v. Taylor · Liteky et al United States · Tumey v. State of Ohio · In the Matters of Lee Roy Murchison and John Whites · Withrow v. Larkin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We are not saying that due process would be offended if a judge presiding over a case expressed a general opinion regarding a law at issue in a case before him or her.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “In short, in determining whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying the change-of-judge motion, the Supreme Court of Indiana employed an unreasonable view of the applicable federal standard as established by the Supreme Court of the United States. 6 3. Judge Bias 105 The general principles concerning a defendant's due process right to an impartial judge are clear in the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “'when a judge has prejudged ... the outcome,' the decision maker cannot render a decision that comports with due process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.