Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

398 F. App'x 606

Sassower v. Thornburgh

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided October 19, 2010

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2010-10-19

Relies on Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia

Decided 2010-10-19

¶1JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

¶2This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by the appellant. See Fed. RApp. P. 84(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

¶3ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order entered June 25, 2010 be affirmed. The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant’s motion for relief under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). See Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia, 841 F.2d 1133, 1138 (D.C.Cir. 1988).

¶4Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. RApp. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

/398/fappx/606 · .json · Public domain