Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 398 FSUPP 209 - Cannon v. US Acoustics Corporation

Cannon v. US Acoustics Corporation’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

73
cited by 73 later decisions
6
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 6 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably Freeman v. Chicago Musical Instrument Co. (1982), Evans v. Artek System Corp. (1983)

22 federal appellate · 6 district · 7 state decisions

31019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 29 U.S.C. § 501

Relies on Scheuer v. Rhodes · United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Ross v. Bernhard · Smith v. Sperling

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whether it could reasonably be said that during the former representation the attorney might have acquired information related to the subject matter of the subsequent representation.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Canon 4: A lawyer should preserve the confidences and secrets of a client. Canon 5: A lawyer should exercise independent professional judgment on behalf of a client. Canon 9: A lawyer should avoid even the appearance of professional impropriety.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(i)f so, then the relationship between the two matters is sufficiently close to bring the later representation within the prohibition of . . . (the canons)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.