Barksdale v. Ryan’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Pierson v. Ray · Preiser v. Rodriguez · Bradley v. Fisher · Pargoud v. United States · Gregoire v. Biddle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“utilize federal civil rights law to bypass the procedural requirements of habeas corpus law.... Plaintiff must exhaust his state judicial remedies before receiving habeas consideration from this court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Barksdale v. Lane
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.