398 Ill. App. 3d 975 - People v. Glorioso’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2011
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Leon · Illinois v. Caballes · Georgia v. Randolph · Illinois v. Krull · Hudson v. Michigan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“will not expand the state exclusionary remedy beyond the federal one, unless the proponent of the expansion can show either that (1) the framers of the 1970 constitution intended the expansion; or that (2) denying the expansion would be antithetical to `state tradition and value as reflected by long-standing case precedent.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. People v. Carter
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.