Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 398 Mass. 18 - Mulhern v. Roach

Mulhern v. Roach’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

63
cited by 63 later decisions
3
states following
December 2011
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 16 district · 42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently December 2011 · most notably 22 Mass. App. Ct. 672 - Wasserman v. Agnastopoulos (1986), 31 Mass. App. Ct. 606 - Beatty v. NP CORP. (1991)

3 federal appellate · 16 district · 42 state decisions

2601986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Grendel's Den, Inc. v. Larkin · Cummings v. National Shawmut Bank of Boston · Building Inspector of Lancaster v. Sanderson · Wojtkowski v. Cade

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the ability and reputation of the attorney, the demand for his services by others, the amount and importance of the matter involved, the time spent, the prices usually charged for similar services by other attorneys in the same neighborhood, the amount of money or the value of the property affected by controversy, and the results secured.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The question of what is fair and reasonable compensation for legal services rendered is one of fact for a trial judge to decide.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.