Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 398 N.E.2d 692 - Banta v. Clark

Banta v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 1983
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State Ex Rel. Young v. Niblack · Indiana State Toll Bridge Commission v. Minor · State Ex Rel. Sendak v. Marion County Superior Court, Room No. 2

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"No agency, except as provided in this act [4-6-5-1 - 4-6-5-6], shall have any right to name, appoint, employ or hire any attorney, or special or general counsel to represent it or perform any legal service in behalf of such agency and the state without the written consent of the attorney-general. "”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “has exclusive power and right in most instances to represent the State, its agencies and officers ... [i]f he consents in writing the agency may employ another attorney.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.