398 N.J. Super. 511 - State v. JA’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
February 2015
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Crawford v. Washington · Gideon v. Wainwright · Stovall v. Denno · Teague v. Lane
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the purpose of the rule and whether it would be furthered by a retroactive application, (2) the degree of reliance placed on the old rule by those who administered it, and (3) the effect a retroactive application would have on the administration of justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“serious question[s] about the accuracy of guilty verdicts in past trials,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“'designed to enhance the reliability of the factfinding process,'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.