Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 398 NW2D 788 - State v. Vincik

State v. Vincik’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
4
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently February 2019

19 state decisions

1001987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Colorado v. Connelly · Mincey v. Arizona · Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · Ohio State Board of Education v. Reed

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A spoliation instruction is 'a direction to the jury that it [may] infer from the State's failure to preserve [evidence] that the evidence would have been adverse to the State.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.