McPike v. Scheuerman’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 2009
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 119 Cal. App. 117 - Peri v. Culley · 124 Cal. App. 2d 91 - Harper v. Superior Air Parts, Inc. · 51 Cal. App. 2d 117 - Adams v. Hildebrand · Mischel v. Vogel · 140 So. 2d 710 - Burnaman v. La Prairie
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) A new trial may be granted to all or any of the parties, and on all or part of the issues. * * * Subject to the provisions of Rule 61, a new trial may be granted for any of the following causes: * * * * * * (5) Error in the assessment of the amount of recovery, whether too large or too small[.] ****** (e) A motion to alter or amend the judgment shall be served not later than 10 days after entry of the judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.