Williams v. Matheny’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Metz Beverage Co. v. Wyoming Beverages, Inc. · Cook v. Shoshone First Bank · Downen v. Sinclair Oil Corp. · Wyoming Community College Commission v. Casper Community College District · Hatton v. Energy Electric Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This doctrine represents the time element of standing by requiring that the interests of the parties which were originally sufficient to confer standing persist throughout the duration of the suit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he central question in a mootness case is 'whether decision of a once living dispute continues to be justified by a sufficient prospect that the decision will have an impact on the parties.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Evidence opposing a prima facie case for summary judgment must be competent and admissible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dimick v. Hopkinson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.