Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 398 SO2D 1093 - State v. Haarala

State v. Haarala’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

157
cited by 157 later decisions
3
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 155 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 157 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably 414 So. 2d 741 - State v. Huizar (1982), State v. Jells (1990)

2 federal appellate · 155 state decisions

68019811990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 277 So. 2d 126 - State v. Prieur · 360 So. 2d 500 - State v. Drew · 354 So. 2d 1332 - State v. Schwartz · 345 So. 2d 874 - State v. Passman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 157 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the purpose served by admission of other crimes evidence is not to depict the defendant as a bad man, but rather to complete the story of the crime on trial by proving its immediate context of happenings near in time and place.”
    47 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “at Power Packing because the verification of the check was an important part of the forgery scheme. We find no error in the ruling of the trial court. ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR NOS. 7 AND 9 In these assignments, defendant argues that the trial court erred in permitting Mr. Vilmarette to narrate the chain of events, including the testimony of”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Reference to that disturbance was necessary to show the immediate context out of which the charged offense arose and to present accurately the state's case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.