Rider v. LeCompte’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently November 2000
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Arceneaux v. Domingue · 377 So. 2d 1325 - Gustin v. Shows · Boyd v. J. C. Penny Co. · 243 So. 2d 112 - Peltier v. Seabird Industries, Inc. · Horil v. Napko Paint Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The redhibitory action must be instituted within a year, at the farthest, commencing from the date of the sale. "This limitation does not apply where the seller had knowledge of the vice and neglected to declare it to the purchaser."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.