Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 398 SO2D 137 - Barbee v. Pigott

Barbee v. Pigott’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
September 2001
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 2001

4 state decisions

20198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Kordel · Sanders v. Hercules Sheet Metal, Inc. · De Vita v. Sills · Gordon v. Federal Deposit Insurance · United States v. Simon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he fact that a man is indicted cannot give him a blank check to block all civil litigation on the same or related underlying subject matter. Justice is meted out in both civil and criminal litigation. The overall interest of the courts that justice be done may very well require that the compensation and remedy due a civil plaintiff should not be delayed (and possibly denied). The court, in its sound discretion, must assess and balance the nature and substantiality of the injustices claimed on either side.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.