¶2The Petitioner has not employed either ARAP 10 (f) or 39 (k) to present the issue he asserts. Therefore, the merits of his contention are not before us, and we are, therefore, compelled to deny his petition, 398 So.2d 320.
¶3WRIT DENIED.
¶4TORBERT, C.J., and MADDOX, JONES, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.