Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 398 SO2D 386 - Rudolph v. State

Rudolph v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 1991
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hubbard v. State · United States v. Harrington · Brantley v. State · 340 So. 2d 840 - Lucy v. State · 364 So. 2d 378 - Holsclaw v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. The Government must have a demonstrable need to introduce the photographs; and "2. The photographs themselves, if shown to the jury, must not imply that the defendant has a prior criminal record; and "3. The manner of introduction at trial must be such that it does not draw particular attention to the source or implication of the photographs.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “3. The manner of introduction at trial must be such that it does not draw particular attention to the source or implication of the photographs.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.