Crum v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably 416 So. 2d 804 - McCray v. State (1982), State v. Vazquez (1982)
33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 368 So. 2d 1278 - Menendez v. State · Carey v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The objective of fairly determining a defendant's innocence or guilt should have priority over other relevant considerations such as expense, efficiency, and convenience.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Tucker v. State · State v. Vazquez“[b]y denying the motion, the trial court forced [the appellant] to stand trial before two accusers: the State and his codefendant.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Rowe v. State · Dean v. State“Granting or denying a motion for severance is normally a discretionary matter for the trial court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rowe v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.