Flora v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
December 1982
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Aultman v. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. · De Winne v. Allen · Whelan v. State · Lane v. Fair Stores, Inc. · Lane v. Fair Stores, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is understandable that litigants, seeing their opponent’s attorney apparently fraternizing with the judge, might feel that they were at a disadvantagé in the trial, no matter how innocent in fact the conduct complained of may have been.... We cannot say that the jury was probably influenced against appellants by the incident. However, attorneys should be quite circumspect in their relations with a judge during a trial, carefully avoiding the least semblance of personal friendship or familiarity which could possibly be misunderstood by the jury; ...” Flora v. Scott, 398 S.W.2d 627, 632 (Tex.Civ.App.1965).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Abrahamson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.