Paccon, Inc. v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
399 F.2d 162 · 1968
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 5 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 124 later decisions — most recently March 2014 · most notably Salmeron v. United States (1983), Broadway Maintenance Corp. v. Rutgers (1982)
12 federal appellate · 5 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co. · United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co. · United States v. Anthony Grace & Sons, Inc. · United States v. Howard P. Foley Co. · Schlesinger v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 124 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * In essence a warranty is an assurance by one party to an agreement of the existence of a fact upon which the other party may rely; it is intended precisely to relieve the promisee of any duty to ascertain the facts for himself. Thus, a warranty amounts to a promise to indemnify the promisee for any loss if the fact warranted proves untrue. * * * [Citations omitted.]”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“[I]n ... administrative proceedings the plaintiff has the ultimate burden of proof, but the defendant is charged with producing evidence peculiarly within its possession [or explaining its absence]; and failure to do so would normally lead to adverse inferences.”). . Indeed, Capt. Richey has demonstrated to the court, and the administrative record has so shown, that the numerous OERs in his employment history, which state that he is”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“not binding on us, but the question may be determined for ourselves under Section 2 of the Wunderlich Act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.