Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 399 F.2d 300 - Grace Hayes v. Portia F. Schaefer, Trustee in Bankruptcy

Grace Hayes v. Portia F. Schaefer, Trustee in Bankruptcy’s Empirical Analysis

399 F.2d 300 · 1968

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
May 2002
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 2002

3 federal appellate · 2 district ·

4019681970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Segal v. Rochelle · Eaton v. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. · Hoffmann v. Newell · Horton v. Moore · Cowan v. Pleasant

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In Kentucky, where a tenancy by the entireties exists, it creates an indivisible estate in both husband and wife which neither can destroy by a separate act. Alienation by either will not defeat the rights of the survivor, and the estate may not be severed by either without the assent of the other. The death of a co-tenant does not increase the interest of the other tenant since from the time the tenancy was created both tenants were seized for the whole.... [T]he surviving tenant of a tenancy by the entire-ties does not inherit from the co-tenant, but rather the surviving spouse takes by virtue of the deed, (citations omitted)”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “whether the property ... is subject to levy of execution and sale.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.