Mann v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
399 F.2d 672 · 1968
Citation profile
46 federal appellate · 13 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 90 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Action on Smoking & Health v. Civil Aeronautics Board (1984), Roberts v. United States (1974)
46 federal appellate · 13 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2401
Relies on United States v. Sherwood · Soriano v. United States · Federal Power Commission v. Tuscarora Indian Nation · Laverick v. United States · Osbourne v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although exceptions to the applicability of the limitations period might occasionally be desirable, we are not free to enlarge that consent to be sued which the Government, through Congress, has undertaken so carefully to limit.”
13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“->:• * However that may have been, it is now well settled by many decisions of this Court that a general statute in terms applying to all persons includes Indians and their property interests. * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.