Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

399 F.2d 689

Docket No. 9951.

Chappell v. Crouse

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1968-07-26

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 1970

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Peyton v. Rowe · Gregori v. United States · Johnson v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1968-07-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

John C. Tillotson, Norton, Kan., for appellant.

Edward G. Collister, Topeka, Kan. (Robert C. Londerholm, Atty. Gen., and Jon K. Sargent, Asst. Atty. Gen., on the motion to vacate appeal and reinstate cause in district court), for appellee.

Before PHILLIPS, HILL and SETH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Appellee, in view of the recent Supreme Court decision, Peyton v. Rowe, 391 U.S. 54, 88 S.Ct. 1549, 20 L.Ed.2d 426, joins in appellant's request that the order appealed from be set aside and the case remanded for further proceedings. We also agree.

¶2

It is appropriate to add that at the time the order appealed from was entered the trial judge properly relied upon the line of cases from this court applicable to the question involved.1 Those cases have since the date of the order been overruled by Peyton v. Rowe, supra.

¶3

The order appealed from is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings.

/399/f2d/689 · .json · Public domain