Bennett v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
399 F.2d 740 · 1968
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently April 2001 · most notably Silverthorne v. United States (1968), United States v. Charles Thomas Bryan and James Eston Echols. Appeal of Charles Thomas Bryan (1973)
19 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 18 U.S.C. § 656 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Jerome v. United States · 204 Cal. App. 2d 652 - Callan v. Superior Court · LeMasters v. United States · People v. Torres
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“. To consummate the offense of larceny there must occur a taking of property which is trespassory in nature, “without the consent of the owner. . . ””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the taking of property by false pretenses, but not 'by taking and carrying away with intent to steal or purloin,' i.e., not by common law larceny, a 'trespassory taking,' " Id. at 744, and reversed Bennett's conviction. 59 It is significant here that the pertinent language of 18 U.S.C. § 641, which the defendant was charged to have violated in Counts Two and Sixteen, providing that "[w]hoever embezzles, steals, purloins or knowingly converts to his own use or the use of another”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“On many occasions the bank loaned money to individuals procured by [an intermediary]. As remuneration for bringing business to the bank, [the intermediary] received a portion of the 'points’ * * * charged for the loans.”); Anglo California Nat’l Bank v. Lazard, 106 F.2d 693, 698 (9th Cir.1939) (equating”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.