Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 399 F.3d 1 - United States v. Lahey Clinic Hospital, Inc.

United States v. Lahey Clinic Hospital, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

399 F.3d 1 · 2005

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
May 2023
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 21 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently May 2023 · most notably United States v. Canova (2005), Blue Cross Blue Shield v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP (2009)

12 federal appellate · 21 district ·

270200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1345 · 31 U.S.C. § 3711 · 42 U.S.C. § 1395 (§ 1801 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States · United States v. United Mine Workers of America · Weinberger v. Salfi · Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Inconsistency between . . . two statutes . . . is not enough: `where two seemingly inconsistent acts can reasonably stand together, a court must interpret them in a manner which gives harmonious operation and effect to both, in the absence of clear and unambiguous expression of Congressional intent to the contrary.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[n]o action against the United States, the Commissioner of Social Security, or any officer or employee thereof shall be brought under section 1331 or 1346 of Title 28 to recover on any claim arising under this subchapter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[I]f the later act covers the whole subject of the earlier one and is clearly intended as a substitute, it will operate similarly as a repeal of the earlier act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.