Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 399 F.3d 150 - Hubbard v. Taylor

Hubbard v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

399 F.3d 150 · 2005

Citation profile

75
cited by 75 later decisions
August 2020
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 16 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently August 2020 · most notably Bistrian v. Levi (2012), Stevenson v. Carroll (2007)

7 federal appellate · 16 district ·

460200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Estelle v. Gamble · Graham v. Connor · Bell v. Wolfish · Duncan v. Walker · SAUCIER v. KATZ Et Al.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “are entitled to greater constitutional protection than that provided by the Eighth Amendment.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[ F]irst, whether any legitimate purposes are served by these conditions, and second, whether these conditions are rationally related to these purposes. In assessing whether the conditions are rationally related to the assigned purposes, we must further inquire as to whether these conditions cause inmates to endure such genuine privations and hardship over an extended period of time, that the adverse conditions become excessive in relation to the purposes assigned to them.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[Pretrial detainees] are not yet at a stage of the criminal process where they can be punished [as defined by the Eighth Amendment] because they have not yet been convicted of anything.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.