Fafel v. DiPaola’s Empirical Analysis
399 F.3d 403 · 2005
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 19 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently December 2020 · most notably Myers v. Richland County (2005), Baella-Silva v. Hulsey (2006)
12 federal appellate · 19 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America · Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De Guinee · Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State Bank · Marek v. Chesny
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The first type of ancillary jurisdiction has been described as 'supplemental' jurisdiction, and is generally codified at 28 U.S.C. § 1367 . The second type of ancillary jurisdiction has been characterized as 'enforcement jurisdiction' and recognizes the 'inherent power of federal .courts to exercise jurisdiction in order to enforce their judgments in certain situations where jurisdiction would otherwise be lacking.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Weighing against this seemingly `inflexible' jurisdictional requirement, however, is a strong interest in the finality of judgments.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]e review de novo the district court's legal conclusion that it had subject-matter jurisdiction to enforce its judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.