Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 399 F.3d 436 - Mt. McKinley Insurance v. Corning Inc.

Mt. McKinley Insurance v. Corning Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

399 F.3d 436 · 2005

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
July 2019
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 4 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · Connecticut National Bank v. Germain · Quackenbush California Insurance Commissioner v. Allstate Insurance Co · Southmark Corporation Southmark Corporation v. Coopers & Lybrand · 176 F3d 473 Thomas Tully v. Children and Youth Services of Allegheny County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Upon timely motion of a party in a proceeding based upon a State law claim or State law cause of action, related to a case under title 11 but not arising under title 11 or arising in a case under title 11, with respect to which an action could not have been commenced in a court of the United States absent jurisdiction under this section, the district court shall abstain from hearing such proceeding if an action is commenced, and can be timely adjudicated, in a State forum of appropriate jurisdiction.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Any decision to abstain or not to abstain made under subsection (c) (other than a decision not to abstain in a proceeding described in subsection (c)(2)) is not reviewable by appeal or otherwise by the court of appeals under section 158(d), 1291, or 1292 of this title....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Proceedings can be core by virtue of their nature if either (1) the type of proceeding is unique to or uniquely affected by the bankruptcy proceedings, or (2) the proceedings directly affect a core bankruptcy function.”) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.