Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 399 N.J. Super. 207 - State v. Hoffman

399 N.J. Super. 207 - State v. Hoffman’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 2015
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Bender · State v. Dalglish · State v. Mirault · State v. Nwobu · State v. Baynes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A patent and gross abuse of discretion is defined as a decision that `has gone so wide of the mark sought to be accomplished by PTI that fundamental fairness and justice require judicial intervention.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`clearly and convincingly establish that the prosecutor's decision constitutes a patent and gross abuse of discretion.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “even when 'the prosecutor's decision is one which the trial court disagrees with or finds to be harsh,'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.