399 N.J. Super. 295 - Gotlib v. Gotlib’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

19 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “A parent from whom financial contribution is sought nevertheless retains the right to challenge the reasonableness of the medical expenses.... Some of the relevant questions to be addressed when considering the reasonableness of a reimbursement request are: (1) was the treatment medically necessary; (2) was the medical treatment in response to an unforeseen emergency requiring immediate action; (8) did the treatment involve elective or cosmetic medical services, and if so, was it in the best interest of the child involved to undergo such treatment; and (4) in cases of elective or cosmetic medical treatment, was the decision economically sound, given the parties' financial resources.... These cases are, by necessity, factually sensitive.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Kevin R. Carbaugh v. Nancy B. Nichols, f/k/a Nancy B. Carbaugh

2. “When declaratory relief is sought, all persons having ... any interest which would be affected by the declaration shall be made parties to the proceeding.” N.J.S.A. 2A:16-56.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Carter v. Doe

3. “in accordance with appropriate legal standards”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Christine Avelino-Catabran v. Joseph A. Catabran