399 Pa. Super. 545 - Commonwealth v. Edwards’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
April 2008
most recently cited
6 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Tuladziecki · Commonwealth v. Durst · Commonwealth v. Davis · Commonwealth v. Nelson · Commonwealth v. Wallace
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) Offense defined. — A person is guilty of forgery if, with intent to defraud or injure anyone, or with knowledge that he is facilitating a fraud or injury to be perpetrated by anyone, the actor: (1) alters any writing of another without his authority!)]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.