Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 399 So. 2d 73 - Patterson v. Patterson

399 So. 2d 73 - Patterson v. Patterson’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
December 2009
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently December 2009

24 state decisions

150198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · Hernandez v. Hernandez · 348 So. 2d 592 - Patterson v. Patterson · Deatherage v. Deatherage · 351 So. 2d 470 - State v. Rollins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he court may from time to time, after considering the financial resources of both parties, order a party to pay a reasonable amount for attorney's fees, suit money, and the cost to the other party of maintaining or defending any proceeding under this chapter, including enforcement and modification proceedings.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It is not necessary that one spouse be completely unable to pay attorney’s fees in order for the trial court to require the other spouse to pay these fees. Given the complexity of the cause and the time necessary to appropriately resolve the issues, the award of attorney’s fees in this case was proper to avoid an inequitable diminution of the fiscal sums granted the wife in these proceedings. 382 So.2d at 1205 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.