Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 399 SW2D 689 - Thomas v. Gates

Thomas v. Gates’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
October 1983
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dixon v. Stringer · Lehman v. Patterson · Potts v. Krey · Benton v. Parks Administrator

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * we think the law applicable to the situation in which a small child darts into the street is this: (1) If the child, before running into the street, was in a position along or near the street where in the exercise of ordinary care the motorist should have seen the child, the motorist has the duty to anticipate that the child may suddenly dart into the street and he must be prepared for that contingency. Potts v. Krey, Ky., 362 S. W.2d 726 ; Benton v. Parks’ Adm’r, Ky., 272 S.W.2d 466 ; Lehman v. Patterson, 298 Ky. 360 , 182 S.W.2d 897 . * * *””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.