Bailey v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2016
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bowling v. Kentucky Department of Corrections · Poe v. Poe · State v. Bay · Gullion v. Gullion · Holman v. Holman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There are four basic grounds upon which a Rule 59(e) motion may be granted. First, the movant may dem onstrate that the motion is necessary to correct manifest errors of law or fact upon which the judgment is based. Second, the motion may be granted so that the moving party may present newly discovered or previously unavailable evidence. Third, the motion will be granted if necessary to prevent manifest injustice. Serious misconduct of counsel may justify relief under this theory. Fourth, a Rule 59(e) motion may be justified by an intervening change in controlling law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.