Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

4 Abb. N. Cas. 148

Canzi v. Conner

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided January 15, 1878

The Superior Court of New York City · decided 1878-01-15

The action was by Helen J. Canzi against William C. Conner, sheriff, et al. The plaintiff appealed from the judgment therein.

The motion to amend by striking out said exception to… · Decided 1878-01-15

Freedman, J.

¶1The settlement of a case is left very much to the discretion of the judge presiding at the trial.

¶2In the case at bar the amendment must be deemed to have been allowed in accordance with the judge’s minutes, which corresponded with the stenographic minutes, and hence it was allowed in accordance with the preponderance of evidence bearing upon the real fact.

¶3The appeal from the order should be dismissed, with costs, and as it was conceded in the argument that in that contingency nothing was left of appellant’s case, the motion made by respondents should be granted, with costs.

/4/abbncas/148 · .json · Public domain