Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 4 ALA 394 - Holt v. Moore

Holt v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

1842

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 2019

2 state decisions

10184218501860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Calder et Wife, v. Bull et Wife.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the thorough conviction that the Legislature could not have intended”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.