Hanen v. Willis’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““73 (a) Limitations; parties. A judgment or order in a civil action or proceeding may be reviewed by appeal as prescribed ir. these Rules, and not otherwise. The appeal may be taken by any party aggrieved by such judgment or order.” “73' (b) [as amended, in part] : Notice of appeal; bond on appeal; * * . When an appeal is permitted by law * * * it shall be perfected by notice filed with the superior court within sixty days from the entry of the judgment or order appealed from, * * * and by filing within such time a bond for costs on appeal.” “73 (e) [in part] : Notice of appeal. The notice of appeal shall specify the parties taking the appeal ' and shall designate the judgment, order or part thereof appealed from. * * *.” “73 (f) [in part]: Forms for notice of appeal. The notice shall state the title of the court and of the action, shall be signed by the attorney, or, if the party is not represented by an attorney, then by the party, and shall be in substantially the following form: 1. If the appeal is from the entire Judgment: ‘Notice is hereby given that the above named.....appeals to the supreme court of the state of Arizona from the judgment entered in the above entitled court, in the above entitled action on the .....day of ... . , 19 . . ., in favor of the above named ....., and against the above named....., and from the whole thereof.’ ””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Hanen v. Willis

2. ““NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the above-named Plaintiff and Counterde- fendant, SAM HANEN, appeals to the Court of Appeals of the State of Arizona, from the Judgment entered in the above-entitled Court in the above-entitled action on the 25th day of April, 1966, in favor of the above-named CONRAD J. KLEINMAN, JERRY SKOUSEN, CLIFFORD WALKER and one GRANT ATKINSON, as co-partners in CORONADO LAND COMPANY, and from the whole thereof.” (Emphasis added.)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Hanen v. Willis

3. ““NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the above-named Plaintiff and Counterde-fendant, SAM HANEN, appeals to the Court of Appeals of Arizona from the • Judgment entered in the above-entitled Court in the above-entitled action on the 9th day of May, 1966, in favor of the above-named CONRAD J. KLEINMAN, JERRY SKOUSEN,' C. II. WILLIS and GRANT ATKINSON as co-partners in CORONADO LAND COMPANY, a co-partnership and from the whole thereof.” (Emphasis supplied.)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Hanen v. Willis