4 Ariz. App. 496 - Allison v. Ovens’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently December 1983
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Thomas · State v. Sowards · Ward v. Ward · Smith v. Smith · 3 Ariz. App. 138 - Bailey v. Bailey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Under these circumstances, this Court would question the wisdom in allowing the children to remain in this potentially damaging environment pending appeal by the posting of a supersedeas bond and we are also unable to say that a bond in any amount will suffice to repair the damage that may be done to children kept in the atmosphere described in this case for the period of time it takes to consider a matter on appeal. * * Allison v. Ovens, 4 Ariz.App. 496, 499 , 421 P.2d 929, 932 (1966), review granted 29 March 1967, opinion vacated, Allison v. Ovens, 102 Ariz. 520 , 433 P.2d 968 (1967).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Young v. Bach““ * * * the fact the prior determination of custody by the court is res judicata as to the circumstances considered by the court at that previous time does not mean that evidence introduced at the prior hearing is necessarily inadmissible at subsequent hearings. Indeed, some matters will have to be shown the court in order that it may determine if there is in fact a change of conditions since the prior hearings.” Allison v. Ovens, 4 Ariz.App. 496, 500 , 421 P.2d 929, 933 , vacated on other grounds, 102 Ariz. 520 , 433 P.2d 968 (1967).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.