Bowen v. Danna’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
January 1986
most recently cited
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Union Paving Co. v. Downer Corp. · Esquire, Inc. v. Varga Enterprises, Inc. · Braswell v. Gehl
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In this situation, we have essentially two different cases. This case was a suit for fraud and misrepresentation in the inducement and sale of real property. In this case, [the purchaser] sought money damages and a jury trial. In the suit in chancery court, [the sellers] brought a foreclosure action based upon default. [The purchaser] raised the defense of fraud and misrepresentation, but not in the sale of the property as was the subject of the suit in the circuit court, but only as these terms related to the allegations of default. Fraud and misrepresentation in the sale of the property was neither raised in the pleadings nor was it argued in the proceedings in chancery court____”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“as the Commission's condemnation counterclaim. Indeed, the two claims did not arise out of the same transaction or occurrence, but rather one was born from the other. 42 We also question whether the Harrisons could have asserted any damage counterclaim in the prior proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“we have essentially two different cases.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.