Dorrian v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
1929
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 1986
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In re Merrill · 83 N.J. Eq. 300 - Staley v. South Jersey Realty Co. · Riehl v. Riehl · In Re Hayden · Lasker v. Lasker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In Chancery of New Jersey. In the matter of (naming the respondents) charged with contempt of court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“is that the incriminating testimony shall be given by witnesses subject to cross-examination and impeachment under the ordinary rules of evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.