Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 4 Backes 241 - Wittes v. Repko

Wittes v. Repko’s Empirical Analysis

1929

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 1977
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 82 N.J. Eq. 211 - Bourgeois v. Risley Real Estate Co. · 98 N.J. Eq. 31 - Welles v. Schaffer · 103 N.J. Eq. 170 - Henry C. McCandless, Inc. v. Schaffer · 89 N.J. Eq. 270 - Harrington Co. v. Horster · Nugent v. Lindsley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On filing such bill the right to redeem shall exist and continue until barred by the decree of the court of chancery.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.