Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 4 Bedell 180 - People v. . Sherlock

People v. . Sherlock’s Empirical Analysis

1901

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
February 1975
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently February 1975

17 state decisions

7019011910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sparf v. United States · Cancemi v. . the People · People v. . Leonardi · Duffy v. . the People · Sunderlin v. . Bradstreet

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But how is this defense [justification] to be made? By proof of the truth of the matter charged as libelous; not his belief of the truth, not his information, nor the strength of the authority upon which such belief was taken up. No question can arise as to the good motive'or justifiable end until the truth is proved.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.