Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

4 B.T.A. 1039

Pennell v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided September 25, 1926

United States Board of Tax Appeals · decided 1926-09-25

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1926-09-25

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 1970

20192619301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1OPINION.

SteRNhagen :

¶2The payment by an individual for general personal legal services, including the preparation of a will, are obviously not “ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred in the taxable year in carrying on any trade or business,” as provided in section 214(a) (1) of the Revenue Act of 1918. If any part thereof could be so classified the burden of allocation must be on the petitioner and not on the Board. We need not therefore discuss the question whether, since the payment of the entire bill of $20,000 was equally *1040divided as between 1920 and 1921 without any earmarking, the petitioner could properly allocate the $3,000 entirely to the first payment in 1920.

¶3Judgment for the Commissioner.

/4/bta/1039 · .json · Public domain