Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

4 Cal. 208

Ray v. Armstrong

California Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1854

California Supreme Court · decided 1854-04-15

Writ oe Error to the County Court of San Francisco. On the 3d of January, 1854, Eay, the owner of the Niantic Hotel, served a notice on Armstrong, his tenant, to quit the premises. On the 4th, they agreed to submit the whole subject matter of “how Armstrong went in and how he was to go out, ” to George Simpton, as arbitrator. On the 5th, Simpton rendered his award in the case, deciding that Armstrong was to abandon the premises on the 9th of January.

Decided 1854-04-15

Mr. Ch. J. Murray

¶1delivered the opinion of the Court.

Mr. J. Heydeneeldt concurred.

¶2The arbitration between the parties, as disclosed by the record, is conclusive, unless affected by fraud or error, and as nothing of the kind appears to have been set up, the award is * decisive of the cause. By its terms, [209] the defendant was to leave the premises on the 9th, while the notice to quit, which precedes the plaintiff’s action, and is necessary to sustain it, was given on the 3d,. and the action is commenced on the 10th.

¶3Under the award, the plaintiff had no right to give notice to quit until the 10th, and then, by the Act of Forcible Entry and Detainer, the defendant had six days in which to remove, before the plaintiff’s right of action.accrued.

¶4It follows that the suit was prematurely begun, and should have been dismissed.

¶5The judgment is reversed, aud the cause dismissed at the costs of the respondent.

/4/cal/208 · .json · Public domain