4 Cal. 236
Decided July 15, 1854
California Supreme Court · decided 1854-07-15
This was a proceeding instituted by the plaintiff Fitzgerald, in the Ninth Judicial District Court, against the defendants, Urton et al. to abate a nuisance, laying his damages at $250, * and praying for a perpetual [236] injunction against them in the commission of the same.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1854-07-15
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 1940
1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1delivered the opinion of the Court..
¶2We can see no reason why the District Court denied its jurisdiction. It has been suggested that the reason may/ have been, because the Act, etc., gives jurisdiction of cases of nuisance to the County Court; but surely this cannot avail to take away the jurisdiction given to the District Court by the Constitution.
¶3The judgment is reversed and the-cause remanded.